2016, the year many cannot wait for the end of also had a few non-traumatic moments, such as the
introduction of the term ‘YouTuber’ into the new version of the Oxford English
Dictionary. And for those who don’t necessarily indulge in the delights
of video by the people and for the people, a YouTuber is a person who creates
video content and uploads to the video-sharing site.
Now that YouTube itself is into its teen years we have seen
YouTubers morph from hobbyists or one-off video uploaders to micro-celebrities
and even stars in their own right, with tens of thousands YouTubers globally
now making a living showing their wares on the site.
How did the random uploaders became hobbyists, then
amateurs, and then a new type of media professional? And what is the difference
between an amateur and a professional anyway? Is it intention, or is it
outcome? Is it getting paid, and if so, how much? Is it the ability to attract
thousands to millions of views? Or is this the future in which everyone is
famous to fifteen people, a dictum issued all the way back in 2005, around the same time as the
hybrid designation “pro-am” (for combination professional amateur) was explored at book length.
Whereas YouTube – and other open uploading platforms, e.g.
SoundCloud, MixCloud, assorted mixtape sites – once existed in a parallel and
necessarily separate universe from this thing we think of as ‘the industry’,
the platforms are increasingly becoming intertwined with industry. And in ways not necessarily planned or imagined. For
example, YouTube has become the new radio, with 1 in 4 music streaming hours spent on the site, which I’m pretty sure was not part of the original vision.
The same goes for the emergence of new entertainment genres, and this is isn’t an overstatement as the numbers don’t lie. Billions of views are being racked up by videos of people unboxing mattresses, of kids doing toy reviews, and in perhaps the most unanticipated category of new genre of media, YouTube videos of people reacting to other YouTube videos. (Ed. Note: Repeated use of 'wtf bro' ahead)
The same goes for the emergence of new entertainment genres, and this is isn’t an overstatement as the numbers don’t lie. Billions of views are being racked up by videos of people unboxing mattresses, of kids doing toy reviews, and in perhaps the most unanticipated category of new genre of media, YouTube videos of people reacting to other YouTube videos. (Ed. Note: Repeated use of 'wtf bro' ahead)
YouTube has also become an important second window for
television, with clips from such shows as Jimmy Fallon, John Oliver, SNL, and
that carpool karaoke guy (okay, James Corden, but to me he’s the carpool
karaoke guy) pulling in millions of additional views by being posted and shared
online. Whether or not I watch the shows (and generally I don’t) I can still
play catch up by having them appear in my Facebook feed or having them pushed
to me as suggested or popular videos when I open YouTube. Just as the music
industry saw an unbundling of songs from albums, now television has an
unbundling, from both format (the 30 or 60 minute program) and distribution
channel, in this case moving from the world of the television schedule to
on-demand, atomized viewing.
No comments:
Post a Comment